Charles Broom vs Menelaos Efstathiou Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Oct at 12:54 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Broom vs M. Efstathiou

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CYP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Efstathiou
They have played 2 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Menelaos Efstathiou winning 0. The last match between Charles Broom and Menelaos Efstathiou was at the Hersonissos 6 Challenger, 12-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broom | 1 |
| Efstathiou | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Hersonissos 6 Challenger(10-12-25)
C. Broom vs M. Efstathiou H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $39,970 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.05% (260-159) | Career Total W/L | 57.28% (122-91) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Broom vs M. Efstathiou Match Preview:
- In recent form, Charles Broom has a slight edge in second serve points, winning 42.56% compared to Menelaos Efstathiou’s 41.24%. A strong second serve performance often correlates with match success.
- When examining return games, Menelaos Efstathiou has outperformed Broom, winning 47.06% of points on the opponent's second serve versus Broom’s 44.34%.
- In first serve returns, Efstathiou also leads with 33.71% compared to Broom’s 27.81%. Is Efstathiou’s superior return game enough to tip the scales in his favor?
- Under pressure, Charles Broom demonstrates resilience, saving 53.33% of breakpoints, while Efstathiou manages 44.17%. This mental toughness can prove crucial in tight match scenarios.
- Both players possess similar performance over the last year, with Broom winning 61.67% and Efstathiou slightly ahead at 62.12% of matches. Does this nearly even win percentage hint at a closely contested match?
- Surface preferences show potential advantages depending on the court. Broom’s strongest performances are on Clay (67%), whereas Efstathiou shines on Hard courts (67%).
- Comparing competitive experience, Broom has consistently faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 156.92 versus Efstathiou’s 323.86. Does this suggest Broom is better primed for high-pressure matches?
- Efstathiou performs better in deciding sets, winning 69% compared to Broom’s 44%. If the match reaches a deciding set, Efstathiou’s track record might influence the outcome.
- Event-specific performance can play a role, implying that recent form during the current event may alter initial predictions.
Editorial Prediction (October 12, 2025, UTC):
As Charles Broom and Menelaos Efstathiou prepare to face off, several key statistics provide insight into potential advantages. Broom holds a slight edge in second serve performance and demonstrates greater resilience under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints. This capability might prove pivotal in critical match moments.
Conversely, Efstathiou’s superior return game, particularly on both first and second serve returns, grants him an edge that could counter Broom's advantages. Additionally, Efstathiou's exceptional performance in deciding sets suggests that should the match extend to a decisive point, his record could strongly influence the outcome.
Both players have shown comparable success rates over the past year, with Broom facing stronger competition on average. This difference in opponent quality could suggest that Broom is better attuned to high-level matches. Considering his slight statistical edge and the competitive experience gained, Charles Broom is poised as the most likely winner in this upcoming match.
Charles Broom vs Menelaos Efstathiou Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Broom vs M. Efstathiou H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:54:46 | Average Match Time | 1:54:46 |
| 63% (44/70) | 1st Serve % | 57% (38/67) |
| 61% (27/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (19/38) |
| 38% (10/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Pts Won % | 63% (5/8) |
| 54% (36/67) | Return Points Win % | 47% (33/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Broom Recent Matches Played
M. Efstathiou Recent Matches Played

C. Broom vs M. Efstathiou Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.05% (260/159) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.28% (122/91) |
| 59.53% (584/397) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.89% (264/217) |
| 53.96% (4999/4265) | Games Win/Loss | 52.28% (2261/2064) |
| 65.99% (130/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.76% (98/66) |
| 66.67% (44/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (19/19) |
| 55.96% (61/48) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 53.19% (25/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1756 | Aces Total | 193 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1037 | Total Double Faults | 442 |
| 1:28:1 | Average Match Time | 1:16:11 |
| 385.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 366.23 |
| 62% (15138/24360) | 1st Serve % | 63% (6261/9913) |
| 70% (10592/15138) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (3871/6261) |
| 50% (4641/9221) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1713/3652) |
| 41% (1100/2667) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (575/1197) |
| 41% (10606/25858) | Return Points Win % | 44% (4474/10075) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 44.74% (51/63) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/7) |
| 69.93% (207/89) | Futures W/L | 60.40% (122/80) |
| 62% (258/416) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (116/204) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 52% (71/136) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (12/28) |
| 54% (77/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (32/55) |
| 87% (248/216) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (114/100) |
| 13% (248/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (114/13) |
| 26% (171/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (99/21) |